People are ignorant.

There is one thing about work. It will give me things to blog about.

Today I was at work and I made a comment about the debates last night. Actually, I said that I was "Joe plumber". I was referring to how many times we have heard the phrase "Joe Plumber".

One of my co-workers stopped me and wanted to talk about the debates. She knows that I am an Obama person. She is going to vote for McCain. She was saying how she liked that he has experience. He has experience at being a politician. He doesn't have any other experience. He has experience at being a pilot, and to be truthful, he wasn't a good pilot or he wouldn't have got shot down.

Obama has been a two term Senator. He spent 12 years as a constitutional lawyer. He wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth like McCain. McCain has never had to provide for his own health care. For his whole life his health care has been provided to him by the government.

She brought up how Obama wants to have more government programs. She said that he is going to have to raise taxes. I don't have a problem with that. I think the rich should have to pay more. Especially since it is their corrupt ways that have this country in the situation that it is in. They hide their money in off shore accounts so they can side step taxes. That should make everyone mad.

It is okay to socialize our private banking system but it isn't okay to have socialized health care. I just don't understand the thinking of some people. That is just ignorant.

This same co-worker in the past has thanked me for my time in the military. She brought up how McCain understands veteran issues. Then I said, McCain votes against funding for veteran issues. Then she told me to be quiet and said that the government can't pay for everything. WHAT? I didn't quite understand why she could talk and I had to be quiet. But that is the way it is with people who want to vote for McCain. They are just plain ignorant.

She said that Obama just talked fluff and McCain talked issues. I wanted to ask her if she was watching the same debate that I was. McCain was just talking the same old Republican talking points. It was Obama that made it clear that McCain is going to tax your employer provided health care. She is okay with her health care being taxed, but she isn't okay with people who make over a 1/4 of a million dollars a year paying a little more? That is just ignorant.

Obama made it clear that he is going to stop the subsidies for oil companies, pharmaceutical companies and corn farmers. That is one way that he wants to help for the programs that this country needs.

My co-worker keeps talking about how Obama wants to create more government programs. I had to inform her that we work in a government office and if it wasn't for government programs she wouldn't even have a job right now. That is just ignorant.

I can't wait for this election to be over. When Obama gets into office it will be great. To bad we couldn't say... if you voted for McCain you don't get any help. Go to your church and ask for help. As if the church is going to help anyone.

I think anyone who for McCain is a lower life form. I really do. He has the "Fight for Peace" mentality.

That is just ignorant.

The love of credit is the root of all evil!!

BannerBreak.com - Banner Maker - Banners




Hopper: You let one ant stand up to us, then they all might stand up! Those puny little ants outnumber us a hundred to one and if they ever figure that out there goes our way of life! It's not about food, it's about keeping those ants in line. That's why we're going back! Does anybody else wanna stay? (from the movie "A Bug's Life")

This supposed credit crisis is like a remake of a movie. The names of the movies you will know, The Banking Crisis, The Recession, The Slump, The Crash, and now, The Credit Crunch.

All of them star the insider actors and actresses from the same elite families and all have but one prime objective: Human control. Everything else is decoration, diversion, and camouflage.

It is the private banks that bring 'money' into circulation by issuing lines of 'credit', which is 'money' that has never, does not, and will never exist. Money is merely mythical figures on a screen that is only worth anything because we take it seriously and believe it to be worth anything. It only has purchasing power because the receiver believes it has purchasing power. It's all a mind game.

When you take out a loan from a bank (put more money into circulation through accepting credit)the bank doesn't print any notes, mint any coins or move precious metals anywhere. It simply types into your computer account the sum of mythical figures on a screen 'credit' that you have agreed to be loaned.

In fact, the bank has loaned you nothing except figures on a computer file and yet from that moment you start paying interest on money that has never, does not, and will never exist. Banking is nothing more than legalised fraud and the biggest organised crime in history.

Here is how the plan works. The banking elite cast the fishing line by keeping interest rates low and making it easy for almost anyone to get credit. This has the effect of putting lots of money into circulation and increases the ability of business and people to buy things.

This creates consumer demand and business takes out more loans for plant, machinery and expansion, and employs more staff, to meet that demand. We now have what they call 'economic prosperity' or a 'boom', although there is always an underclass that never benefits.

During such 'boom times', people, like business, feel more confident and vast numbers buy a bigger house, bigger car and have more expensive vacations, paid for often times, by loans or a line of credit.

During a 'boom' business and people get themselves into more debt and even those who don't secure bank loans bash their credit card to increase their purchasing power in the face of mass advertising (mind control) to buy, buy, buy.

This prosperity is only made possible by the increases in credit (money in circulation)that allows the increase in spending. And who controls that? The banks controlled by the elite banking families like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and he rest.

When the world is saturated in credit (debt on 'money' that doesn't exist)the banking cartel triggers stage two of what ignorant economists and economic correspondents call the 'economic cycle'. Next the elite banking families, reel in and net their catch...us.

They do this by reducing the amount of credit they issue and calling in many loans already on their books. This has the effect of taking 'money'- purchasing power ' out of circulation and transforms the manufactured 'boom' into a manufactured 'bust'.

With less money in circulation, people can buy less and so businesses need to produce less. This leads to big increases in unemployment, bankruptcy and people losing their homes because those businesses and people are no longer able to earn the income necessary to service the loans they took out during the 'good times'.

But, of course, when they accepted those loans of non-existent 'money' they had to sign over as security their wealth that did exist - their home, car, business or land - and so when they fail to 'repay' their 'loans' of credit the banks seize their wealth that does exist in exchange for not paying back 'money' that has never existed, except in theory.

The Banking 'Crisis'..It's a big club and you ain't in it!

The Debt Scam


It is impossible to understand the global economy unless we appreciate the background to the world money system. This is not taught in the schools and no smart suited economist or correspondent on the television news will tell you the truth either. Some of them don't know what is going on because they have been programmed to believe nonsense by the education system, while others simply don't want you to know.

The foundations of the manipulation toward a world government, army, bank and currency are built on the fantastic con trick we call the banking system. Once people understand the way this works, it is easy to see how a few can control the lives of everyone else.

The banks are given the power to 'create' money, by which they mean 'creating' non-existent money known as credit. This cost them nothing, but the moment this credit is brought into theoretical existence the banks can start to charge interest on it. This is the system that controls everyone's life. But it goes further then that. When you take out a loan, the bank 'creates' credit for the size of the loan, say $20,000. If only in theory, that is 'new' money. But your are not going to pay back only $20,000, because you have to pay interest on that loan. The interest has not been 'created' by the bank, but it still has to be found from somewhere. So where? From the wealth and credit already circulating in the world.

In this way, since this crazy banking system began, the real wealth of the planet has been sucked into the banking system as the interest paid on every loan to every person, business, and government. This has allowed them to lend even more non existent money on the back of that and get the world even deeper in-debt. The wealth and credit loaning capacity they have accumulated is beyond comprehension, far more than that of the United States, the richest country in the world. In fact, they own the United States, as they own almost every other country in the world. The bankers have used this wealth and credit mountain to buy and control the global oil companies, multinationals of every kind, the media, the armament companies, the drug companies, the politicians, the political 'adviser's', and virtually everything else they need to control the world. The same few people and families own the lot! They hide this truth behind the front organizations, the desire for secrecy by the pathetic media and the education system. The Rockefeller's and Rothschild's alone control a fantastic network of banks, oil companies, multinational corporations, airlines and scores of others organizations.

The Rockefeller/Rothschild Chase Manhattan Bank has enough power by itself to stimulate a global financial panic. We could be seeing that happening now with the current banking problems.

By controlling the creation of credit, the bankers can cause booms and busts, nationally and internationally, whenever they wish to further their ambitions. An economic depression is not caused by a collapse in the demand for goods and services. People do not decide that they no longer want jobs done or articles produced. An economic depression is caused when there are not enough pieces of paper and electronic 'money' in circulation to pay for those goods and services. And who controls the amount of money-credit in circulation? The banks. If they want to cause a depression for ulterior motives, as in pre-war Germany and the US, they take measures which reduce the amount of money in circulation. They reduce the number of loans they make and raise interest rates. Currently, banks are very cautious about lending money to other banks. Our banks are having to go to other countries to borrow money.

This also reaps a colossal reward for the major (Global Elite) banks. People still have to pay the interest on loans taken out before the manufactured economic collapse and if they default, the banks take their property and increase by hundred's of thousands the number of farms, businesses, and homes they own. And with every payment of interest by those who continue to pay their loans during a depression, more money is being taken out of circulation and not recycled back into the economy, thus increasing the depression.

This process of reducing money in circulation and causing a depression can be seen all the time. The economists and their poodles, the politicians and economic correspondents, call all this part of the 'economic cycle'. Bull Crap! In the 1930's that terrible depression, in which men, women , and children starved in a world of plenty, was caused by the banks withdrawing money from circulation by refusing loans. It wasn't that people didn't want to eat; they simply could not afford to buy the food because money had been artifically taken out of circulation. I will leave it to an 'insider' to sum up the situation I have described. Rober H. Hemphill, a credit manager at the Fedreal Reserve Bank in Atlanta, said:

"This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks. Someone has to borrow every dollare we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks creat ample synthetic money we are prosperous, if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless postition is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most improtant subject intelligent persons can investigate and relect upon. It is so important that our present civilisation may collapse, unless it becomes widely understood and the defects remedied very soon."- Sheldon Emery, "Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People" - Spotlight newspaper reprint, (February 3rd 1986) p8. this article was sasummary of Emery's book of the same name.

There was no money, people were told, to build houses and feed the population. But suddenly, when it was time for the Golbal Elite's war, the money available to finance Hitler, Japan, and the war effort in the United States and Great Britain was limitless. People often say that there always seems to be money available to fight wars. Of course there is, because the bankers who control the world economic system want those wars. They do not want people well-housed with full bellies and a proper education because then they would be much harder to control. It was not the much hyped 'New Deal' policies of Franklin Roosevelt which ended the 30's depression, it was the banks putting money back into circulation to finance the war they were creating. Here is a reality of life on Earth:

There is no need for anyone to be cold, hungry, homeless or in poverty. All these things are casued by the lack of pieces of paper and electronic numbers called money circulation in the world and by the charging of interst on them. We could change that today if the diesire was there.

Hair samples don't match the man accused of the anthrax killings

So, here we are again. The government has closed the case on the anthrax killings, yet it has no REAL evidence against the man who has since 'committed suicide'.

They have examined some hair that was supposedly that of the Dr. Ivins. Guess what, it isn't his hair. How shocking is that? Yet, the government still has the case labeled as closed. I just don't understand that. Well, I really do understand that. He knew the truth and therefore had to be silenced. Dead men don't talk.

After seven years, they don't have any real culprits? Give me a break. It isn't as if Joe Blow off the street can walk into the lab and say, I will have one of those, and two of these. For goodness sake there is a log. Someone from up on high had this done. I can guess who was involved in that.

Hair Samples in Anthrax Case Don't Match

Strands From Mailbox in Princeton Are Not From Ivins, Investigators Say

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 14, 2008; A02



Federal investigators probing the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks recovered samples of human hair from a mailbox in Princeton, N.J., but the strands did not match the lead suspect in the case, according to sources briefed on the probe.

FBI agents and U.S. Postal Service inspectors analyzed the data in an effort to place Fort Detrick, Md., scientist Bruce E. Ivins at the mailbox from which bacteria-laden letters were sent to Senate offices and media organizations, the sources said.

The hair sample is one of many pieces of evidence over which researchers continue to puzzle in the case, which ended after Ivins committed suicide July 29 as prosecutors prepared to seek his indictment.

Authorities released sworn statements and search warrants last week at a news conference in which they asserted that Ivins was their sole suspect. But the materials have not dampened speculation about the merits of the investigative findings and the government's aggressive pursuit of Ivins, a 62-year-old anthrax vaccine researcher. Conspiracy theories have flourished since the 2001 attacks, which killed five people and sickened 17 others.

Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee announced it will call FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III to appear at an oversight hearing Sept. 17, when he is likely to be asked about the strength of the government's case against Ivins. A spokeswoman for Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), a vocal FBI critic, said he would demand more information about how authorities narrowed their search.

The House Judiciary panel, meanwhile, is negotiating to hold a separate oversight hearing in September with bureau officials, in a session that could mark the first public occasion in which Mueller faces questions about the FBI's handling of the anthrax case.

Friends and former colleagues of Ivins, who died before he could see the full array of evidence prosecutors had gathered, continue to demand information about the DNA advances that authorities say led them to a flask in Ivins's lab.

Defense lawyer Paul F. Kemp yesterday said he wonders "where Ivins could have possibly stored this anthrax without any employees seeing it, or if he took it home, why there was no trace" of the deadly spores, despite repeated FBI searches over the past two years of Ivins's car, his work locker, a safe-deposit box and his house.

Meanwhile, government sources offered more detail about Ivins's movements on a critical day in the case: when letters were dropped into the postal box on Princeton's Nassau Street, across the street from the university campus.

Investigators now believe that Ivins waited until evening to make the drive to Princeton on Sept. 17, 2001. He showed up at work that day and stayed briefly, then took several hours of administrative leave from the lab, according to partial work logs. Based on information from receipts and interviews, authorities say Ivins filled up his car's gas tank, attended a meeting outside of the office in the late afternoon, and returned to the lab for a few minutes that evening before moving off the radar screen and presumably driving overnight to Princeton. The letters were postmarked Sept. 18.

Nearly seven years after the incidents, however, investigators have come up dry in their efforts to find direct evidence to place Ivins at the Nassau Street mailbox in September and October 2001.

British and US companies win Iraq oil contracts

British and US companies win Iraq oil contracts

Matthew Weaver
guardian.co.uk,
Monday June 30 2008 10:12 BST

The Iraqi government is to award a series of key oil contracts to British and US companies later today, fuelling criticism that the Iraq war was largely about oil.

The successful companies are expected to include Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil, Chevron and Total.

Non-Western companies, notably those in Russia, are expected to lose out.

The technical support contracts will give the companies access to Iraq's vast untapped oil fields. Oil production in Iraq is at its highest level since the invasion in 2003. The Iraqi government wants to increase production by 20%, as the country has an estimated 115bn barrels of crude reserves.

The US state department was involved in drawing up the contracts, the New York Times reported today.

It provided template contracts and suggestions on drafting but were not involved in the decisions, US officials said.

Democratic senators last week lobbied that the awarding of the contracts should be delayed until after the Iraqi parliament passes laws on the distribution of oil revenues.

Frederick Barton, senior adviser at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, told the paper: "We pretend it [oil] is not a centerpiece of our motivation, yet we keep confirming that it is."
Last year Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve said: "Everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil."


I find it interesting that Russia is loosing out on the oil deals and now they are invading Georgia which sits on, you guessed it, a pipeline. Could it be that we want control of the pipeline. Could it be that Bush is claiming that Russia needs to stop its fighting. That coming from us, who invaded Iraq, oh brother. We are saying public ally that we want them to stop, but privately we are in favor of the conflict. We figure if we can't control the oil pipeline, Russia surely isn't. So once again, we will send in our forces, secretly, or we will say we are sending support. When in actuality, we are funding both sides.

Bush and Putin sure looked friendly while they were sitting next to each other at the Olympics.

This is something to watch. That is for sure.

Laura

Whats up with this war against Russia and Georgia?

When I heard about this whole Russia and Georgia thing, the first thing that came to mind was...where is the oil.

I didn't know for sure that oil was involved but I figured that it must be. Well, today I read on the BBC website: BP shuts down Georgia Pipelines. How nice is that?

Energy giant BP says it has shut two of three pipelines that run through Georgia as a precautionary measure. Of course I am sure that will insure the current price of gasoline. www.newsvote.bbc.co.uk

There is a station down the street from me that is a BP station. It sits across the street from a Citgo station. The BP station has a sign that says that BP is the better gas because they produce to most oil for the US and because they are not run by a dictator. Give me a break. They act as if BP is an American company. The BP stands for British Petroleum. They could give to hoots about our country.

This seems very much like our participation in Iraq. We kept things in conflict until they caved to our way of thinking. Now that they have agreed to let BP, Unocal, Chevron and all the other oil companies to do business, unfairly at that, then the violence goes down. Imagine. Now violence is picking up in Afghanistan because there is a pipeline that runs through the mountains where the Taliban are in charge. Hunt oil company has been active there. We are having conflict again because the tribal leaders don't like the fact that the US is going back on its word.

PROPAGANDA


If you look at the pictures at the top, you will see that the people all look different but upon closer inspection the whole picture begins to look strange. For instance in the first picture you can see one obviously dead body of a person in a checkered shirt. The other body is carried by medics, carried as if it was a dead body, but you can notice that the hand of a person is holding a woman medic's sleeve. Well so far everything looks pretty real, except maybe for one guy in black who doesn't look anyhow concerned.

Then if you look at the second picture:

Now on the second picture we see a crying man and a body in his hands. But look closely! This is the same checkered shirt, same trousers and shoes, the same person. So does it mean that the crying man took the body brought it some place else? Hardly so, this is just one of the participants of the show. And again if you look close enough you can notice that the guy crying is the person in black from the previous picture.

Then on the third picture:

Now here he is again, alone still with some clothes on, or may be he got changed.

Generally if you see the pictures you can notice that nothing happens around the scene. No people running, and there are actually not a lot of people for a big residential building area if it was really bombed.

Not oly was Reuters busted for faking war photos but so was CNN.


CNN blamed for using misleading war video
American broadcaster CNN has been accused of using the wrong pictures in their coverage of the conflict in South Ossetia. A Russian cameraman says footage of wrecked tanks and ruined buildings, which was purported to have been filmed in the town of Gori, in fact showed the South Ossetian capital Tskhinvali.




So you see, nothing is as it seems is it?

"Truth is not what happened, truth is what we tell people".

Keep a sharp eye open for the misleading news. It is all around us.

I am back!!!

It has been quite a summer so far. I have been busy getting ready for school in the fall and dealing with family life. I won't bore you to tears with all of that. Suffice it to say that I have twin teens and they have kept me quite busy this summer.

I am playing around with different formats for the show. Things will change frequently until I get a good feel. I didn't so much care for the last format. The main reason is because I would get callers that just wanted to argue. They do not have the information that I have and do more talking when they should be doing more listening. They would make me angry with their ignorance. I think that I am going to use the hang up button more then I have been. I would prefer if people would make their comment and then get off the line. Instead they hang on as if they are a guest that I want to talk to. I will tick some folks off but that is okay. Then there is this guy that always calls the show and talks his ignorant rant and then has his own show and runs me down. That is okay though. He calls my show and then gets upset because I am a liberal. Umm...doesn't my name say that? Why call my show and be surprised that you are talking to a tree hugger. Egad!

LOCAL NEWS

As rough as this city can be..it can be just as beautiful, which is why I stay. I love my city. WATCH! Sorry I couldn't get the link to work.



The murder tally in Racine is down. If you believe the newspaper anyway. Unfortunately all that happens in Racine is not covered. You hear so much more if you have a scanner. What is put in the paper is bad enough, I guess no one would live here if they knew everything that went on.

Early Saturday morning a Chicago teenager was shot and killed at a gas station on 16th and Murray. Supposedly the teenager was exchanging words with someone in the parking lot. A male occupant of a white Ford Explorer fired shots at Youngblood as he left the lot. If anyone has information they can call crime stoppers at 262-636-9330. http://www.journaltimes.com/articles/2008/08/11/local_news/doc489de131e9a71466223599.txt

STRANGE SUICIDES

When ever I hear about another suicide, I always ask the question, what were they involved in. For example, something that you didn't hear nearly enough about was the DC Madam. In case you didn't hear about her, she was the TOP call girl service for Washington DC. She was brought up on all kinds of charges. There were some very high name political figures associated with her. Republican David Vitter, was on the list. Was he dragged through the coals...of course not. Jeane Palfry was getting ready to be sentenced. She made it perfectly clear that if she went to jail...she wasn't going alone. Then guess what happened? She was found dead. In her mothers shed of all places. Supposedly of a suicide. I don't believe it. Listen to the show to hear the latest on that.

Then there is the recent suicide of the aide of Senator Jim Webb. He was only 26. He seemed to have it all in front of him. Then he commits suicide? I am going to research that a little further. Something doesn't sound right. He must have known something about something. Time will tell.

There was the apparent suicide of an Air Force Brigadier general . This is why I think this is strange. Tinsley was named base commander in May 2007. His previous 22 moth assignment was executive officer to the Air Force chief of staff, Gen. T. Michael Mosely, who in June resigned under pressure in an agency shake up. Defense Secretary Robert Gates ousted both Mosely, the Air Force military chief, and Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne, the agency's civilian head, holding them accountable for failing to fully correct an erosion of nuclear related performance standards. One concern was a cross country flight in August 2007 of a B52 carrying armed nuclear weapons. That is three strange suicides that have happened this summer. I will be looking in to those in greater depth.

GOSSIP

This is a hot week for gossip. For those who just HAVE to know..this is the segment for you. Love is in the air..NOT! Dr. Phil and his wife are rumored to be calling it splitsville. I could see that coming. His first mistake was putting his wife on his show. It was just a matter of time before she would want her own. She isn't even all that good. Who the hell is she to tell any of us anything? She reminds me of those christian TV shows where the wife of the preacher has a show and she is telling all of us women how to be better (subservient) to our husbands...GAG!!

Then of course there is the news about John Edwards cheating on his wife. I learned about this I don't know HOW long ago. How did I know about it before the mainstream media? I read the National Enquirer. They are right more often then they are wrong. An Enquirer reporter caught up with John at a hotel. Just so happened that the woman that he had the affair with is at the same hotel..with a baby no less. John hid in a restroom until security came and helped him leave the building...hmmm...now he is on TV saying how sorry he is..yawn.

BUT here is the biggest gossip. GEORGE BUSH and his wife Laura are rumored to be getting separate places to live. Actually, Bush himself said that Laura was in Dallas looking for a new house. He said he was staying at Crawford.

OPEN TOPIC

I am starting a new dating segment. Once a month I will be interviewing a very good friend of mine. She is a dating expert extraordinaire. Her name is Pussy Galore. Don't be frightened by her name. She is a delightful person. I know you will enjoy her. Get your questions ready. She is experienced in many dating environments. Nothing will shock or surprise her. I will have a special show for her debut. Keep an eye out. She is well worth the wait!!!

Ms. Galore will soon have her own blog that you will be able to speak with her directly. She will let us know about her latest dating experience.

TTYL!!
Eileen